The existence of suboptimal farmland turns out a environmental problem. Because its production is not effective, water is wasted and destroys the biodiversity of the area. To combat this, various experts propose to move these fields to ideal growing areas. You want to know more? we tell you.
Solutions to reverse environmental damage
We have to do something to stop climate change and we have to do it ya. Experts of the cambridge colleges, Pekin and Harvard have conducted research to try to help the environment. In this way they have concluded that a possible solution to reverse the environmental impact would be relocate the farmland. Years ago, in 2017, the scientific journal Nature Geoscience already proposed this redistribution. On this occasion, to promote the increased food production y reduce water consumption.
However, this idea came to nothing. So the possible solution raised doubts and complications: cultural or political barriers; different consumption patterns in each country; the supply and demand of each crop; economic resources, etc. Given this, university experts express the necesidad de relocate current farmland to others that they consider optimal. In addition, they assure that the areas that will be abandoned would also contribute to promoting regeneration. Thus being able to turn back the clock on carbon emissions.
The study was carried out through a mathematical model with which the different possibilities of distributing farmland were analyzed. For this the located on global maps in which the 25 main crops in the world were represented. Among them the barley, wheat and soybeans, food which represent more than three quarters of world crops. The result of this work was the identification of the most beneficial options for agriculture and society. That is, maintain production and damage the environment as little as possible.
Farmland issues
The appropriation of nature in order to turn it into farmland has posed the three most serious environmental challenges. Which are: the biodiversity loss, la lack of water and increase in the emission of greenhouse gases. And it is that, in relation to the latter, many studies have ensured that food production is responsible for 25% of the emissions of these gases. Above all, if we talk about products such as rice, corn or soy. Although, more than half of all these gases, 60%, come from the meat.
Not only that, it is a fact that crops have occupied natural habitats. Replaced its biodiversity and its carbon. There have even been cases in which crops have been built in less than optimal conditions. Pointless factor that plays against productivity, continue to waste water and promotes gas emissions. This is what you want to fight against. Redistributing these crops to other better areas. Likewise, andThese would be regenerated and environmental benefits would be achieved quickly and significantly.
What would change?
Following the instructions of the experts, what would be carried out would be a farmland relocation. In this way the great European and Indian cultivation areas would be left fallow. To transfer to new and large extensions located in the midwestern united states and lowland area of the African desert of the Sahara. The results of this research ensure that it would be achieved reduce the impact of farmland by 71% global. The impact of the production of these fields on biodiversity would decrease. Like the consumption of water.
Although everything looks very good carrying it out is going to be very difficult by the refusals of Europe and India to abandon their production. Europe, for example, is implementing various policies unrelated to this investigation. We must not forget that more than 70% of the agricultural surface of the European Union is destined to the cattle feed. According to a Greenpeace report.
The theme proposed by experts, researchers and scientists it is quite complex. Well, many interests intervene in it, such as that of food and commercial dependence and self-sufficiency. However, the environmental situation should be a priority. Since it affects globally and its importance obscures the economy. Do you support the idea of moving farmland?
