Mugaritz is a restaurant that, in the words of its chef, Andoni Luis Aduriz, «has helped a site as conservative as Donosti be more cheeky”. However, replicate a human fetuso for the diner to eat has been too much for many people. However, we have to clarify that the restaurant has been a victim of the speed of the internet that prevents to contrast information. What happened to the restaurant and why doesn't it offer a fetus on its menu?
Mugaritz, victim of misinformation
All the social media they bring out the worst in us and often cause misinformation to spread. It is the case of the chef's fetus Andoni Luis Aduriz. The protagonist of this grotesque controversy is already known for his restaurant in Rentería, Guipúzcoa. The restaurant Mugaritz has Both of you Michelin star and is usually positioned between the 50 best in the world. So, it would be strange if he took a risk by incorporating a dish that imitates a fetus into his menu. What has really happened?
It is doubtful that the restaurant stands to lose some of its more reluctant clientele to abortion. After all, a client is a client. The truth is that the controversial plate details the fetus perfectly. It seems that the diner really bites it. For this, the chef has used a bean gel. Besides, the cabeza has a almond that crackles when you bite it to give realism. Now it does not belong to the menu, but to a collection Art and internal reserved for a few.
Satanic dish?
However, pro-life organizations such as Institute of Social Policy (IPSE) They have unleashed discord on the networks. In this way, he has launched a signature campaign with the purpose of Aduriz eliminating "immediately" from his menu the supposed dish called 'Cooked Mimesis of a Human Embryo'. They allege that "makes fun of abortion" and the generalist media that published it with this name gave it more hype. Some Internet users have even commented on Trip Advisor that it is a "satanic plate"
On the other hand, the chef Mugaritz has denied the accusations and has made it clear that the dish is called "Source" and dating from 2015. He has only shown it in small meetings (such as university seminars) to generate a context of reflexión. He has also made it clear that he regrets that the unverified images and information have hurt sensitivities. Thus, the controversy is settled since the dish, according to Aduriz, will never be on the menu. What do you think?
